c iconv

Creationists often attack that which they don't understand. A misconception regarding vestigials and biological organisms causes one YouTube creationist to produce a video exposing his misunderstandings.

The Problem of Good. A video essay. Part 2. William Lane Craig believes he can solve the ancient, and most devastating attack on Christian theism: The Problem of Evil. Why would an all-powerful, all-good and all-loving god allow evil and suffering?

Proponents and skeptics of the biblical tale of the flood of Noah are deadlocked in debate. Can a solution to the puzzle really be this simple?

In this, the third segment of my series examining JPHolding's apologetic response regarding the story of Elisha and the Bears from 2 Kings, we will look at Holding's attempt to hide behind the "honor/shame" nature of ancient Israelite society, the number 42 as it relates to the number of boys in the Elisha story and the phrase "go on up".

The Problem of Good. A video essay. Part 3. William Lane Craig believes he can solve the ancient, and most devastating attack on Christian theism: The Problem of Evil. Why would an all-powerful, all-good and all-loving god allow evil and suffering?

In this on-going series of videos examining the creation story of Genesis, we come to Day 3. In this period, God is said to have gathered the waters into seas, exposed the dry land and brought forth vegitation. How does this sequence of events line up with modern scientific discoveries?

If you have a materialistic, atheistic, confined and shackled mind, you can't see the human soul. However, if you're a freespirit, it's as plain as the nose on your face. In this two-part examination of a YouTube apologist's argument for the existence of the soul, do we find out this "antidote" needs to be recalled as so many other recent ineffective drugs?

If you have a materialistic, atheistic, confined and shackled mind, you can't see the human soul. However, if you're a freespirit, it's as plain as the nose on your face. In this two-part examination of a YouTube apologist's argument for the existence of the soul, do we find out this "antidote" needs to be recalled as so many other recent ineffective drugs?

Part 2 of my detailed rebuttal to JPHolding's apologetic regarding the story of Elisha and the bears in 2 Kings. This segment examines the interpretation of the Hebrew "qatan na'ar" as little boys.

The fifth and final installment of my series obliterating JPHolding's attempt to salvage the Elisha and the Bears story of 2 Kings. In this conclusion I contrast the apologist's "creative" effort with a more straight-forward reading of the text as fiction, a tale used to illustrate and propagandize proper Yahweh worship. I also speculate on why so much fuss is given over to the Elisha and the Bears story by both skeptics and apologists.